編號 : 2015075
項目名 : Project investment decision making: Can residual valuation distinguish good and bad development projects?
學會持續專業發展編號 : Formal Events
講師 : Sr Trackie Lam Kei San (林紀新測量師)
Mr Lam is a Member of the,Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors a Member of Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, a Chartered Financial Analyst and a Member of Hong Kong Securities Institute. Mr Lam has extensive experience on site acquisition, evaluation and disposal of development projects in urban areas. He is currently Property Investment Director of Soundwill Real Estate Agency Limited a wholly owned subsidiary of Soundwill Holdings Limited, a renowned developer in Hong Kong. He is overseeing the evaluation, acquisition, disposal of and strata-title sales of various development projects and investment projects of the Group. Mr. Lam has over 20 years of real estate experience in Hong Kong and 10 year experience in the PRC. Before joining Soundwill Group in 2009, he was the Senior Director in Valuation and Advisory Services - Greater China in CBRE Limited, an international real estate consultant firm.
日期 : 29/05/2015
時間 : 7:00 pm – 8:30 pm
持續進修小時 : 1.5
有關組別之資格預審前研習小時 : 1.5
地點 : 香港上環干諾道中111號永安中心12樓 1207室測量師研究中心
部門 : 規劃及發展組
主辦單位 : PDD
截止日期 : 15/05/2015
費用 : HK$120 for members; HK$150 for non-members (HK$30 walk-in surcharge on all prices listed); Free of charge for student members studying full time (subject to availability)
名額 : PDD & GPD Members; First-come-first-served
語言 : Cantonese supplemented by English
詳情 :

Residual Valuation Method is extensively adopted in public and private practices in Hong Kong.  In some disciplines, standard template has been adopted as a default decision making tools involving development projects.  This authentic valuation method has seldom been questioned.  However, if the entire market uses this unanimous valuation method, why the land sales outcomes are often so different from the expert predictions?  Can this valuation method distinguish a good project from a bad one?  The speaker tries to explain and discuss with you his observations in the deficiency of this valuation method and common mistakes in the application of this valuation method.